Your Vote
Decides
Web3's Best

CLARITY Act Update: New Advocacy Group Targets DeFi Rules Ahead of Senate Vote

Coingapestaff
19 hours ago Updated 13 hours ago
Coingapestaff

Coingapestaff

Journalist
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Read full bio
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
CLARITY Act

Highlights

  • Investors For Transparency launches Fox News ads against the CLARITY Act’s DeFi rules.
  • Crypto experts dispute “deposit flight” claims, citing GENIUS Act protections.
  • $120B DeFi lending sector could be at risk; group criticized for anonymity.

As the US CLARITY Act edges closer to a key Senate vote next week, a new advisory group has emerged, challenging the bill’s DeFi rules. This last-minute pressure campaign, as highlighted by Eleanor Terrett, highlights the ongoing debate and tensions surrounding DeFi regulation.

Crypto and TradFi Clash Over DeFi Rules in CLARITY Act

In an X post earlier today, Fox Business journalist Eleanor Terrett underscored the escalating tensions within the crypto regulatory ecosystem. Referring to the formation of a new advocacy group, called ‘Investors For Transparency,’ Terrett highlighted the unsettled tensions around decentralized finance.

Terrett noted that the group has launched an advertising campaign on Fox News, criticizing the CLARITY Act’s DeFi provisions. Just days before the critical Senate vote on the market structure bill, the group is urging the community to push back against the DeFi laws. Highlighting the long-standing uncertainty around DeFi regulation in the US, she added,

“DeFi remains one of the most divisive elements of the legislation, drawing criticism from lawmakers, traditional finance players, and the crypto industry alike. While the final wording of the DeFi provisions is still uncertain, more clarity is expected next week when the Senate Banking Committee unveils its section of the bill ahead of Thursday’s markup.”

Notably, the Investors For Transparency group surfaces just ahead of the CLARITY Act markup next week. As CoinGape reported recently, Senator John Kennedy confirmed that the market structure markup is scheduled for the coming week, with Chairman Tim Scott expected to vote.

Advocacy Group Faces Backlash

Despite the advocacy group’s strong presence, it faces backlash from the crypto industry. Drawing attention to the flaws in the group’s arguments, industry experts and enthusiasts warn that changes to the DeFi rules could bring major consequences.

While the group posits that the DeFi provisions pose critical threats like “deposit flights,’ industry experts dispute these claims. Pointing to the GENIUS Act, which already addresses the issue, preventing stablecoin issuers from distinguishing interest payments as “rewards,” they argue that the CLARITY Act is well-structured.

Further, crypto enthusiasts claim that $120 billion DeFi lending sector could collapse if the industry is forced to follow the Traditional Finance (TradFi) rules. An X post read,

“Forcing DeFi into TradFi compliance models would collapse the $120B decentralized lending sector overnight, vaporizing the 23% annual efficiency gains in cross-border settlements that blockchain enables. The Senate Banking Committee’s markup risks undermining existing statutory clarity just to appease banks whining about competition from code.”

Moreover, the advisory group is also facing criticism for its anonymity. Despite calling itself “Investors For Transparency,”  the group provides little transparency about its members or backers. Keith A. Grossman, a prominent crypto voice, noted, “Now all kidding aside, not a single reference on the site to who is backing “Investors for Transparency.”

Advertisement
coingape google news

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more… to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

Newsletter
Your crypto brief.
Delivered every day.
  • Insights that move markets
  • 100,000 active subscribers
By signing-up you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.
Your Vote
Decides
Web3's Best
Cross