Coinbase Accused of XRP Pay to Play Listing Scheme

Coingapestaff
1 hour ago
Coingapestaff

Coingapestaff

Journalist
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Read full bio
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Data shows Coinbase XRP reserves dropped from 780M to 132.4M, fueling concerns over manipulation and falling institutional demand.

Highlights

  • Coinbase XRP listing claims highlight alleged fee disputes and delayed market access concerns.
  • XRP price declines as market cap and trading volume show reduced short term activity.
  • Institutional interest grows while policy debates and stablecoin rules remain unresolved.

Coinbase is facing additional attention after claims resurfaced about how XRP was listed on the exchange. The issue traces back to statements linked to David Schwartz, who described a possible scenario in 2023 that reflected tensions surrounding the listing process. According to the report, Coinbase declined to list XRP despite clear business incentives.

Coinbase XRP Listing Dispute and Alleged Fee Structure

The case brought out by Schwartz outlined a continued dispute. He said Coibase chose not to list XRP even though it appeared beneficial. According to an X post, Ripple failed to pay the requested listing fee, which pushed the asset off the exchange for months. During that period, both sides maintained their positions, and no listing took place.

Schwartz also noted that the exchange suggested XRP would have been listed earlier if Ripple did not exist. That information gave an explanation for the delay and changed how the situation was viewed internally. However, over time, Ripple reached a financial agreement with Coinbase, allowing the listing to move forward.

Once XRP was listed, it reportedly accounted for about 20% of the exchange’s total revenue. This outcome brought out the trading demand for the asset. Schwartz stated that Ripple viewed the payment as necessary to avoid limiting market access. He also indicated that elements of such arrangements later appeared in legal arguments, where they were used to show influence over adoption or liquidity.

XRP Price Movement and Market Activity

While these claims continue to circulate, the XRP price has displayed a negative price movement. Over the past 24 hours, the asset traded at $1.32 at the time of writing, recording a decline of 1.547%.

XRP price movement over the past 24 hours
XRP price movement over the past 24 hours

The market capitalization stood at $80.52 billion, resulting in a 2.1% drop. The trading activity also declined, with 24-hour volume at $974.76 million, down by 13.37%.

Institutional Positioning and Policy Context Around Coinbase

At the same time, institutional activity around XRP continues to expand. Franklin Templeton, which manages about $1.6 trillion, outlined its position on the asset. During a podcast, Roger Bayston discussed XRP and its role in financial infrastructure. He referenced the launch of the Franklin XRP ETF and the integration of tokenized money market funds on the XRP Ledger.

Bayston stated that institutions are acquiring XRP based on use rather than speculation. He explained that firms rely on the asset to support operational needs tied to blockchain infrastructure. He also pointed to ongoing regulatory alignment between the SEC and CFTC as a factor that could influence further adoption.

These moves are arising alongside ongoing policy discussions involving Coinbase. The exchange has informed Senate offices that it does not support the latest stablecoin yield compromise linked to the CLARITY Act. Lawmakers, including Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks, have joined efforts to resolve disagreements between banking and crypto stakeholders.

However, the stablecoin rewards rule remains unresolved. Earlier expectations of a compromise have fallen apart after pushback from Coinbase and other industry participants.

coingape google news

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more… to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

Newsletter
Your crypto brief.
Delivered every day.
  • Insights that move markets
  • 100,000 active subscribers
By signing-up you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.