Coinbase CLO Calls On Ripple, Robinhood, Binance After SEC’s Latest Mishap

Coingapestaff
May 14, 2024 Updated November 4, 2024
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Coinbase CLO Paul Grewal Calls Out FDIC Over Incomplete FOIA Responses

Highlights

  • Coinbase CLO Paul Grewal fumed as the SEC revealed what went wrong in the Debt Box case.
  • Grewal also called upon other industry participants, such as Ripple and Binance to know if the SEC followed the correct procedure in their case.
  • The CLO also highlighted that Coinbase wasn't provided with a 'thorough explanation' by the SEC.

In a recent development shaking the crypto space, Coinbase Chief Legal Officer (CLO) Paul Grewal has taken a bold stance against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Moreover, he urged fellow industry giants such as Ripple, Robinhood, Binance, and others to scrutinize their interactions with the regulatory body.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Coinbase CLO Questions Ripple, Binance, Uniswap & Others

Directly addressing prominent entities in the cryptocurrency and financial space, Grewal posed a series of pointed questions. In a post on X, the Coinbase CLO asked Robinhood if they got a ‘thorough explanation’ in their Wells process. In addition, he called upon the crypto entities who were slapped with Wells notices from the SEC. These include Ripple, Binance, Kraken, and Uniswap.

Moreover, the Coinbase CLO’s inquiry aimed to shed light on whether other companies had experienced similar treatment from the SEC. This suggests a pattern of behavior rather than an isolated incident. In addition, Grewal labeled the SEC’s actions as “straight up gaslighting.”

Additionally, he hinted at an intentional manipulation of facts to deceive or confuse. Moreover, the Coinbase CLO emphasized the significance of the matter, particularly in the context of the ongoing legal proceedings before Judge Shelby and the United States District Court.

Also Read: Ripple SEC News: XRP Institutional Sales Discounts, Agreement to Sell, & Other Key Details Sealed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Grewal Spotlights Not Receiving A Thorough Explanation

Grewal’s call to action comes in the wake of a striking revelation made by him regarding the SEC’s handling of the case against Debt Box. In a scathing critique, the Coinbase CLO highlighted the SEC’s failure to adhere to its own protocol. He slammed the SEC for not following the Wells process, which is designed to provide clarity to potential defendants.

He quoted the SEC’s admission, which stated, “The Wells process is designed to aid the charging decision for a specific potential defendant. The SEC staff typically provides a thorough explanation of the evidence it would use to prove potential charges against a particular person or entity.”

Additionally, the Coinbase CLO highlighted the crypto exchange’s stance of not receiving an explanation on a similar move against them. He wrote, “We received no ‘thorough explanation’ of the evidence of what assets supposedly gave rise to securities transactions. We weren’t told what assets were at issue at all.” This departure from the usual procedure, Grewal argued, raises questions about the validity of the SEC’s claims.

Also Read: Coinbase CLO Slams SEC for Skipping Wells Process in Debt Box Lawsuit

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.