Coinbase Vs. SEC: Coinbase Pushes To Subpoena Gary Gensler Despite Recent Setback

Rupam Roy
July 13, 2024
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Coinbase Wins Partial Victory in Court Against US SEC Rule Denial

Highlights

  • Coinbase pushes to subpoena SEC Chair Gary Gensler's personal device and emails.
  • Elizabeth Goody files to appear as SEC's counsel in the Coinbase Vs. SEC lawsuit.
  • Coinbase remains undetermined to ensure transparency in the regulatory process.

Coinbase Vs. SEC Lawsuit: In a significant move, the leading crypto exchange has continued its legal battle, seeking to subpoena SEC Chair Gary Gensler. Despite recent challenges, the crypto exchange presses for access to Gensler’s personal devices and emails, hoping to uncover crucial communications about the crypto market.

For context, in a recent hearing, where the SEC seeks to dismiss the exchange’s subpoena on Gary Gensler, Judge Katherine Polk Failla showed dismay with the exchange’s effort. Commenting on the development, she said that she was “surprised” and that too “not in a good way”.

Advertisement
Advertisement

New Developments In The Legal Battle

Amid the ongoing Coinbase Vs. SEC lawsuit, Elizabeth Goody has joined the SEC’s legal team against the exchange. In a recent filing with the court, Elizabeth Goody has filed to appear as a counsel to the U.S. SEC, further intensifying market discussions.

Meanwhile, this addition comes as the SEC has recently closed investigations into several crypto firms, including Consensys, Paxos, and Hiro, without recommending enforcement actions. This move has sparked discussions in the crypto market about the SEC’s current stance on crypto regulations.

However, CLO Paul Grewal commented on these recent developments, expressing hope that the SEC’s retreat signals a willingness to work with the crypto industry in good faith. In a recent X post, Grewal stated:

Let’s hope that what is plainly a retreat signals the SEC is ready to start acting in good faith and actually work with the industry it claims to engage, rather than just handing out Wells notices like candy.

Meanwhile, this ongoing Coinbase lawsuit highlights the broader struggle for regulatory clarity in the crypto industry. The exchange’s persistent efforts to subpoena Gensler reflect the company’s determination to ensure transparency and fairness in the regulatory process.

Also Read: US Bitcoin ETFs See $1.1 Billion Inflow This Week, BTC Holdings At All-Time High

Advertisement
Advertisement

Coinbase Vs. SEC Lawsuit: Legal Showdown Intensifies

On July 11, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York held a hearing on the exchange’s request in the ongoing Coinbase Vs. SEC lawsuit. The exchange’s lawyer argued that the U.S. SEC had not assured them that Gensler hadn’t used personal devices to communicate with market participants.

However, Judge Katherine Polk Failla found these arguments speculative and noted that requests for information before Gensler’s chairmanship would be difficult to justify. Notably, Judge Failla suggested that the crypto exchange should focus on obtaining information from the period after Gensler became Chair.

However, despite setbacks, Coinbase remains determined. “We’re unable to get information from the SEC,” the lawyer stated, emphasizing the need for transparency regarding Gensler’s communications.

Meanwhile, the SEC’s lawyer, Jorge Tenreiro, countered that the exchange’s request was intrusive, arguing that the focus should be on the SEC’s actions, not on Gensler’s personal communications. He stated, “Chair Gensler is not a fact witness, and is certainly not an expert witness on the law.”

Judge Failla expressed concerns about the burden of inquiry but indicated that further briefing would be expected. Lastly, Judge Failla asked the exchange to file a motion to compel “by Monday” if they are not willing to withdraw the subpoena on Gary Gensler. The lawyer agreed to that, reflecting its push towards legal clarity.

Amid this, the latest filing for a pre-motion conference has further fueled discussions.

Also Read: Crypto Stocks Rebound as COIN, MSTR, and MARA Soar

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
Rupam is a seasoned professional with three years of experience in the financial market, where he has developed a reputation as a meticulous research analyst and insightful journalist. He thrives on exploring the dynamic nuances of the financial landscape. Currently serving as a sub-editor at Coingape, Rupam's expertise extends beyond conventional boundaries. His role involves breaking stories, analyzing AI-related developments, providing real-time updates on the crypto market, and presenting insightful economic news. Rupam's career is characterized by a deep passion for unraveling the complexities of finance and delivering impactful stories that resonate with a diverse audience.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.