Crypto debit, credit, and prepaid cards often look very similar when you first see them. Most promise rewards, easy spending, and “crypto in the real world.” The differences usually show up later; once fees kick in, limits are hit, or rules around custody and settlement become clear.
Our approach to reviewing crypto cards is built around that reality. We try to understand how a card actually behaves once someone starts using it, not just how it is presented on a landing page.
COMPREHENSIVE COVERAGE
EXTENSIVE RESEARCH
IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS
EXPERT INSIGHTS
This review approach is used only for crypto cards. That includes debit cards, prepaid cards, and so-called crypto credit cards that let users spend against crypto balances.
It does not apply to exchanges, wallets, DeFi platforms, or token projects. Those categories have their own review logic.
We don’t try to include every crypto card that has ever existed.
In practice, a card is reviewed only if it is currently live, open to new users, and usable for real-world spending through networks like Visa or Mastercard. Fees, limits, and core terms must be publicly available. If basic information isn’t clear, the card doesn’t make it into the guide.
Cards that are discontinued, paused, or effectively closed to new users are left out. For example, older programs like the BlockFi Rewards Visa card are excluded because including them would only create confusion for readers.
We don’t try to include every crypto card that has ever existed.
In practice, a card is reviewed only if it is currently live, open to new users, and usable for real-world spending through networks like Visa or Mastercard. Fees, limits, and core terms must be publicly available. If basic information isn’t clear, the card doesn’t make it into the guide.
Cards that are discontinued, paused, or effectively closed to new users are left out. For example, older programs like the BlockFi Rewards Visa card are excluded because including them would only create confusion for readers.
All card details are taken from public sources. This usually means official issuer websites, published card terms, fee schedules, and reward program disclosures. When licensing or regulatory information is available, we take that into account as well.
Crypto cards often have different terms depending on region. When that happens, we rely on the most commonly applicable version and note regional differences where they materially affect fees, rewards, or availability.
All card details are taken from public sources. This usually means official issuer websites, published card terms, fee schedules, and reward program disclosures. When licensing or regulatory information is available, we take that into account as well.
Crypto cards often have different terms depending on region. When that happens, we rely on the most commonly applicable version and note regional differences where they materially affect fees, rewards, or availability.
Our crypto card rankings are not pay-to-play.
Some cards may have commercial relationships with Coingape, others may not. That does not change how they are scored. Every card is reviewed using the same framework, and partnerships do not influence rankings.
All cards, including those with and without commercial relationships, are reviewed using the same criteria and weightings.
The point of the list is to help readers compare options realistically, not to push any particular product.
Our crypto card rankings are not pay-to-play.
Some cards may have commercial relationships with Coingape, others may not. That does not change how they are scored. Every card is reviewed using the same framework, and partnerships do not influence rankings.
All cards, including those with and without commercial relationships, are reviewed using the same criteria and weightings.
The point of the list is to help readers compare options realistically, not to push any particular product.
Instead of focusing on one headline number, we look at a mix of factors that tend to matter once a card is actually in use.
Rewards are part of that, but they are never viewed in isolation. High cashback rates often come with staking requirements, caps, FX spreads, or subscription fees that reduce their real value. We account for those trade-offs.
Fees are treated seriously. That includes FX markups, ATM charges, withdrawal limits, and any ongoing subscription costs. Cards that are hard to understand or unpredictable in day-to-day spending usually score lower.
Custody also matters. Some cards rely entirely on custodial wallets, others use hybrid setups, and a few lean closer to self-custody. We look at what that means for user control and risk, rather than treating all custody models as equal.
Availability and onboarding are also important. A card that looks great on paper but is hard to access, heavily restricted by region, or slow to onboard is less useful in practice.
Temporary promotions, targeted offers, or features not available to the general public are not factored into scores.
Finally, we pay attention to usability. That includes app quality, card controls, settlement speed, reward payout timing, and how well the card works for everyday spending, including travel.
Instead of focusing on one headline number, we look at a mix of factors that tend to matter once a card is actually in use.
Rewards are part of that, but they are never viewed in isolation. High cashback rates often come with staking requirements, caps, FX spreads, or subscription fees that reduce their real value. We account for those trade-offs.
Fees are treated seriously. That includes FX markups, ATM charges, withdrawal limits, and any ongoing subscription costs. Cards that are hard to understand or unpredictable in day-to-day spending usually score lower.
Custody also matters. Some cards rely entirely on custodial wallets, others use hybrid setups, and a few lean closer to self-custody. We look at what that means for user control and risk, rather than treating all custody models as equal.
Availability and onboarding are also important. A card that looks great on paper but is hard to access, heavily restricted by region, or slow to onboard is less useful in practice.
Temporary promotions, targeted offers, or features not available to the general public are not factored into scores.
Finally, we pay attention to usability. That includes app quality, card controls, settlement speed, reward payout timing, and how well the card works for everyday spending, including travel.
Cards are scored across 12 factors, grouped into three areas. Temporary promotions, targeted offers, or features not available to the general public are not factored into scores.
Reward Quality and Real Return: We look at actual cashback after FX spreads, caps, staking rules, token volatility, and regional fees.
Reward Token Flexibility: We check whether users can choose their reward asset or are locked into a single token.
Staking and Lock-In Requirements: Cards that require staking or lock-ups to unlock higher rewards are scored lower due to added risk and opportunity cost.
FX and ATM Fees: We assess transparency of FX rates, ATM charges, withdrawal limits, and predictability of costs.
Cost vs Value: We compare subscription or card fees against the real benefits users receive.
Availability and Onboarding: We review supported countries, KYC requirements, and ease of access.
Asset Support and Spendability: We measure how well supported assets convert to fiat at the point of spend.
Custody Model: We evaluate whether funds are custodial, self-custodial, or hybrid, and what that means for user control.
Issuer Reliability: We consider regulatory posture, transparency, and any past operational issues.
Note: Unlike traditional credit cards, crypto cards are typically pre-funded or custodial products, which means users bear more direct risk.
App and Card Controls: We look at virtual cards, spend controls, alerts, freezes, and account tools.
Settlement and Reward Timing: Faster crypto-to-fiat settlement and reward payouts score higher.
Everyday Usability: We consider acceptance, travel usability, and how the card performs in daily spending.
Cards are scored across 12 factors, grouped into three areas. Temporary promotions, targeted offers, or features not available to the general public are not factored into scores.
Reward Quality and Real Return: We look at actual cashback after FX spreads, caps, staking rules, token volatility, and regional fees.
Reward Token Flexibility: We check whether users can choose their reward asset or are locked into a single token.
Staking and Lock-In Requirements: Cards that require staking or lock-ups to unlock higher rewards are scored lower due to added risk and opportunity cost.
FX and ATM Fees: We assess transparency of FX rates, ATM charges, withdrawal limits, and predictability of costs.
Cost vs Value: We compare subscription or card fees against the real benefits users receive.
Availability and Onboarding: We review supported countries, KYC requirements, and ease of access.
Asset Support and Spendability: We measure how well supported assets convert to fiat at the point of spend.
Custody Model: We evaluate whether funds are custodial, self-custodial, or hybrid, and what that means for user control.
Issuer Reliability: We consider regulatory posture, transparency, and any past operational issues.
Note: Unlike traditional credit cards, crypto cards are typically pre-funded or custodial products, which means users bear more direct risk.
App and Card Controls: We look at virtual cards, spend controls, alerts, freezes, and account tools.
Settlement and Reward Timing: Faster crypto-to-fiat settlement and reward payouts score higher.
Everyday Usability: We consider acceptance, travel usability, and how the card performs in daily spending.
On individual crypto card review pages, we use a 5-star rating system to summarise how a card performs overall.
The star rating is not based on a single feature or headline reward. It reflects how a crypto card performs across the core areas covered in this methodology, including fees, rewards structure, custody model, issuer reliability, accessibility, and everyday usability.
Each card is reviewed using the same set of considerations. Strong points, such as low fees or flexible rewards, are weighed alongside drawbacks like staking requirements, FX markups, limits, or custodial risk. No single benefit is enough on its own to determine the final score.
Star ratings are meant to be comparative, not predictive. A higher rating means a card performs better relative to other crypto cards we’ve reviewed, but it does not mean the card is risk-free or suitable for every user. Factors like region, spending habits, and risk tolerance can significantly affect whether a card is a good fit.
The written review always provides more context than the star rating alone. Readers should use the full review to understand why a card received a particular score and whether those trade-offs matter for their situation.
Scores are intended to help compare crypto cards within this guide. They are not a recommendation or a guarantee of suitability. A higher score does not mean a card is safer or better for every user.
Factors like custody model, regional availability, fees, and how a card is funded often matter more than rewards depending on how a card is used.
On individual crypto card review pages, we use a 5-star rating system to summarise how a card performs overall.
The star rating is not based on a single feature or headline reward. It reflects how a crypto card performs across the core areas covered in this methodology, including fees, rewards structure, custody model, issuer reliability, accessibility, and everyday usability.
Each card is reviewed using the same set of considerations. Strong points, such as low fees or flexible rewards, are weighed alongside drawbacks like staking requirements, FX markups, limits, or custodial risk. No single benefit is enough on its own to determine the final score.
Star ratings are meant to be comparative, not predictive. A higher rating means a card performs better relative to other crypto cards we’ve reviewed, but it does not mean the card is risk-free or suitable for every user. Factors like region, spending habits, and risk tolerance can significantly affect whether a card is a good fit.
The written review always provides more context than the star rating alone. Readers should use the full review to understand why a card received a particular score and whether those trade-offs matter for their situation.
Scores are intended to help compare crypto cards within this guide. They are not a recommendation or a guarantee of suitability. A higher score does not mean a card is safer or better for every user.
Factors like custody model, regional availability, fees, and how a card is funded often matter more than rewards depending on how a card is used.
Crypto cards are often marketed around rewards and branding, but long-term satisfaction usually comes down to fees, reliability, and how predictable the card is to use.
This methodology is designed to surface those practical differences so readers can make decisions based on how a card is likely to behave after sign-up, not just on promotional claims.
Crypto cards are often marketed around rewards and branding, but long-term satisfaction usually comes down to fees, reliability, and how predictable the card is to use.
This methodology is designed to surface those practical differences so readers can make decisions based on how a card is likely to behave after sign-up, not just on promotional claims.
Crypto card programs change frequently. Fees, rewards, limits, and availability can all shift with little notice.
Treat any review as a snapshot in time and always verify current terms directly on the issuer’s official website before applying or spending.
Since 2016, CoinGape has been dedicated to providing crypto enthusiasts and investors with expert insights and actionable information.
Our team of industry experts, meticulous researchers, and an engaged community work together to offer the most thorough and valuable content in the crypto sector.
Monthly Readers
Newsletter Subscribers
Articles Published
Hours of Research
Expert Contributors
5M+ Monthly Page Views
50k+ Articles
Claim Bonus