CoinGape has been covering cryptocurrency and blockchain markets since 2017. Our editorial team evaluates projects and platforms using structured review frameworks focused on transparency, utility, and risk assessment. You can explore our review methodologies to see how we assess and rate different categories. We maintain clear editorial standards and disclose advertising or affiliate relationships where applicable.
Decentralized exchanges, also known as DEXs, are quietly growing into one of the most convenient ways to trade crypto, especially if you care about privacy and staying in control of your funds. Rather than allowing a central authority to custody your funds, with DEXs, you keep your funds with you and still trade directly on-chain using smart contracts.
Why are Crypto Investors Shifting to DEXs in 2026?
As of 2026, most centralized crypto exchanges are embracing regulation and tightening compliance. While this is a positive step, it also means increased government oversight, which some feel defeats the purpose of decentralization and privacy. For many privacy-minded traders, this fear of censorship has led to a surge in the search for trusted DEX platforms.
If you’re one of those looking for a DEX with deep liquidity, this guide is for you. Based on the CoinGape review methodology, we have curated a list of the most trusted decentralized exchanges. We have also covered how DEXs work, key selection criteria, potential risks, and the trends you should be aware of as a DEX trader in 2026.
Best for Retail Accessibility and High-Yield Gamification
Best for Deep Liquidity and Programmable DeFi
Best for High Speed Perps and On-Chain Order Books
| Name | 24h Trading Volume | Fees | Chains | Liquidity Model Type | Supported Assets | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
Pancakeswap V3(BSC) |
24h Trading Volume
$421.04M
|
Fees
0.01%, 0.05%, 0.025%, 0.1% ( trading fees)
|
Chains
BSC
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLAMM
|
Supported assest
1532
|
|
|
2
Uniswap V3 (ETH) |
24h Trading Volume
$441.93M
|
Fees
0.01%, 0.03%, 0.05, 1% (swap fees)
|
Chains
ETH
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
1,852
|
|
|
3
Orca |
24h Trading Volume
$207.92M
|
Fees
0.01%- 2% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
SOL, Eclipse
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
2,328
|
|
|
4
Aerodrome Slipstream |
24h Trading Volume
$225.82M
|
Fees
Dynamic
|
Chains
BASE
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
348
|
|
|
5
Uniswap v4 (Ethereum) |
24h Trading Volume
$368.74M
|
Fees
Dynamic
|
Chains
ETH
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
1,289
|
|
|
6
Meteora |
24h Trading Volume
$105.68M
|
Fees
Dynamic Fees
|
Chains
SOL
|
Liquidity Model Type
DLMM
|
Supported assest
2,368
|
|
|
7
Uniswap V3 (Arbitrum One) |
24h Trading Volume
$211.06M
|
Fees
0.01% - 1% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
ARB
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
389
|
|
|
8
Hyperliquid |
24h Trading Volume
$89.91M
|
Fees
Spot: 0.025% - 0.07%
|
Chains
Hyperliquid
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLOB
|
Supported assest
73
|
|
|
9
Raydium (Solana) |
24h Trading Volume
$45.51M
|
Fees
0.01%- 1% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
SOL
|
Liquidity Model Type
Hybrid
|
Supported assest
14,670
|
|
|
10
Curve (Ethereum) |
24h Trading Volume
$152.53M
|
Fees
0.04% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
ETH
|
Liquidity Model Type
AMM
|
Supported assest
471
|
|
|
11
Bluefin |
24h Trading Volume
$14.76M
|
Fees
Maker:0.035% Taker: 0.010%
|
Chains
SUI
|
Liquidity Model Type
Hybrid
|
Supported assest
69
|
|
|
12
Fluid (Ethereum) |
24h Trading Volume
$243.00M
|
Fees
0.0001% - 0.05% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
ETH
|
Liquidity Model Type
Hybrid
|
Supported assest
29
|
|
|
13
Cetus |
24h Trading Volume
$14.82M
|
Fees
0.01%- 4% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
SUI
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
224
|
|
|
14
Pancakeswap (Base) |
24h Trading Volume
$141.31M
|
Fees
0.01%- 0.05% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
BASE
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
95
|
|
|
15
Uniswap V4(BSC) |
24h Trading Volume
$153.01M
|
Fees
Dynamic
|
Chains
BSC
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
664
|
|
|
16
Balancer V3 (Ethereum) |
24h Trading Volume
$120.08M
|
Fees
0.04% - 0.1% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
ETH
|
Liquidity Model Type
Hybrid
|
Supported assest
78
|
|
|
17
Quickswap |
24h Trading Volume
$35.06M
|
Fees
0.3% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
POL
|
Liquidity Model Type
Hybrid
|
Supported assest
298
|
|
|
18
SunSwap V3 (Tron) |
24h Trading Volume
$19.87M
|
Fees
0.05%, 0.3% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
TRON
|
Liquidity Model Type
AMM
|
Supported assest
27
|
|
|
19
Camelot V3 (Arbitrum) |
24h Trading Volume
$3.91M
|
Fees
0.3% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
ARB
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
89
|
|
|
20
LFJ V2.2 (Avalanche) |
24h Trading Volume
$40.35M
|
Fees
0% -1% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
AVAX
|
Liquidity Model Type
DLMM
|
Supported assest
45
|
|
|
21
Pancakeswap V3 (Arbitrum) |
24h Trading Volume
$15.83M
|
Fees
0.05% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
ARB
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
71
|
|
|
22
Uniswap V3 (Base) |
24h Trading Volume
$107.75M
|
Fees
0.01%, 0.05%, 0.3%, 1% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
BASE
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
1,776
|
|
|
23
Maverick Protocol V2 (Ethereum) |
24h Trading Volume
$16.55M
|
Fees
0.01% - 3% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
ETH
|
Liquidity Model Type
DDAMM
|
Supported assest
9
|
|
|
24
Maverick Protocol V1 (Ethereum) |
24h Trading Volume
$17.38M
|
Fees
0.01% - 3% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
ETH, BASE
|
Liquidity Model Type
DDAMM
|
Supported assest
19
|
|
|
25
Blackhole V3 |
24h Trading Volume
$43.11M
|
Fees
Dynamic
|
Chains
AVAX Chain
|
Liquidity Model Type
Hybrid
|
Supported assest
49
|
|
|
26
Aerodrome (Base) |
24h Trading Volume
$6.27M
|
Fees
0.01% - 0.3% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
BASE
|
Liquidity Model Type
Hybrid
|
Supported assest
429
|
|
|
27
Ramses V3 (HyperEVM) |
24h Trading Volume
$3.99M
|
Fees
0.05% - 5% ( Swap fees)
|
Chains
HyperEVM
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLAMM
|
Supported assest
31
|
|
|
28
Velodrome SlipStream (Optimism) |
24h Trading Volume
$7.24M
|
Fees
0.01% – 0.3% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
OP
|
Liquidity Model Type
Hybrid
|
Supported assest
37
|
|
|
29
OpenOcean |
24h Trading Volume
$15.15M
|
Fees
0% -0.25% (Protocol fees)
|
Chains
BSC
|
Liquidity Model Type
Aggregator
|
Supported assest
1,481
|
|
|
30
Magma Finance |
24h Trading Volume
$1.00M
|
Fees
0.05% - 5% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
SUI
|
Liquidity Model Type
ALMM
|
Supported assest
17
|
|
|
31
Dodo (Ethereum) |
24h Trading Volume
$44.38M
|
Fees
0.1% (Route fee)
|
Chains
ETH
|
Liquidity Model Type
PMM
|
Supported assest
134
|
|
|
32
Manifest |
24h Trading Volume
$65.28M
|
Fees
0%
|
Chains
SOL
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
41
|
|
|
33
Hyperion |
24h Trading Volume
$14.59M
|
Fees
0.01% - 1% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
APTOS
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
27
|
|
|
34
Project X |
24h Trading Volume
$57.49M
|
Fees
Dynamic
|
Chains
HyperEVM
|
Liquidity Model Type
AMM
|
Supported assest
106
|
|
|
35
PumpSwapAster |
24h Trading Volume
$40.73M
|
Fees
0.3% ( Trading fee)
|
Chains
SOL
|
Liquidity Model Type
AMM
|
Supported assest
16,533
|
|
|
36
Aster |
24h Trading Volume
$15.74M
|
Fees
Maker: 0.004% Taker: 0.05%
|
Chains
BNB, ETH
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLOB
|
Supported assest
8
|
|
|
37
Dexalot |
24h Trading Volume
$11.89M
|
Fees
Maker: 0-0.10% Taker: 0.02% - 0.12%
|
Chains
AVAX
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLOB
|
Supported assest
18
|
|
|
38
Rhea Finance |
24h Trading Volume
$6.81M
|
Fees
0.05% - 1% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
Near
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
89
|
|
|
39
Thorchain |
24h Trading Volume
$10.98M
|
Fees
Dynamic
|
Chains
Thorchain
|
Liquidity Model Type
AMM
|
Supported assest
38
|
|
|
40
Curve (Arbitrum) |
24h Trading Volume
$2.26M
|
Fees
0.01% - 0.1% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
ARB
|
Liquidity Model Type
AMM
|
Supported assest
54
|
|
|
41
Uniswap V3 (Avalanche) |
24h Trading Volume
$3.05M
|
Fees
0.01%, 0.05%, 0.3%, 1% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
AVAX
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
50
|
|
|
42
Fluid (Arbitrum) |
24h Trading Volume
$10.87M
|
Fees
0.01 (Swap fees)
|
Chains
ARB
|
Liquidity Model Type
Hybrid
|
Supported assest
14
|
|
|
43
Minswap |
24h Trading Volume
$907.93K
|
Fees
0.05% - 20% (V2 trading fees)
|
Chains
Cardano
|
Liquidity Model Type
AMM
|
Supported assest
152
|
|
|
44
Pharoah Exchange |
24h Trading Volume
$104.63K
|
Fees
Dynamic
|
Chains
AVAX
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
12
|
|
|
45
Near Intent |
24h Trading Volume
$23.65M
|
Fees
0.0001% - 0.2%
|
Chains
Near
|
Liquidity Model Type
Aggregator
|
Supported assest
151
|
|
|
46
Thalaswap |
24h Trading Volume
$28.57K
|
Fees
0.05% - 1% (Swap fees)
|
Chains
Aptos
|
Liquidity Model Type
AMM
|
Supported assest
14
|
|
|
47
Momentum |
24h Trading Volume
$2.75M
|
Fees
0.01% 0 2% (Swaps)
|
Chains
SUI
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
56
|
|
|
48
Ekubo |
24h Trading Volume
$4.19M
|
Fees
Dynamic
|
Chains
Starknet
|
Liquidity Model Type
AMM
|
Supported assest
101
|
|
|
49
Byreal |
24h Trading Volume
$6.52M
|
Fees
Dynamic (Pool-based)
|
Chains
SOL
|
Liquidity Model Type
Hybrid
|
Supported assest
48
|
|
|
50
DefiTuna |
24h Trading Volume
$580.83K
|
Fees
Dynamic (Pool-based)
|
Chains
SOL
|
Liquidity Model Type
CLMM
|
Supported assest
13
|
DEXs may appear complex at first, but are easy to use once you understand them. The first thing to know is the core idea behind a DEX, and that’s to eliminate a middleman. CEXs like Binance act as middlemen or central authorities in crypto. This works for traders who do not mind someone else being in custody of their funds. Some people prefer a CEX because it feels like using a traditional bank. Everything is controlled.
But some traders stick to the idea of freedom from control, which they believe is the idea behind blockchain. How do DEXs facilitate trade and not custody your funds? They use smart contracts. Smart contracts are code with instructions.
On a DEX, you trust the smart contract and not a central person. That’s the core thing to note. Now, to fully understand DEX trading, there are some related concepts you must familiarize yourself with.
Non-custodial trading simply means no one is holding your funds. They are always in your wallet and not with some platform. That’s what DEXs offer. As I explained earlier, DEXs rely on smart contracts to make trading easy and possible.
Smart Contracts:
DEXs have low entry barriers, unlike CEXs, which require KYC and serious documentation for you to trade certain volumes. For a DEX, you only need a wallet. Fortunately, we’ve made it easier for you to pick from the best crypto wallets of 2026.
Liquidity is another key thing to understand when using a DEX. Think of liquidity as petrol for a DEX. Without liquidity, trades execute more slowly and are more expensive. The thing is, DEXs use different liquidity models because they all have different priorities.
DEXs like Uniswap use a model called Automated Market Maker (AMM). This model uses liquidity pools. Other DEXs use order books, which are close to what most centralized exchanges offer.
They match buyer and seller orders on-chain. Some DEXs combine both models or improve on some. Neither model is “best”. But the model in use could decide how much you pay, the slippage, and how smooth your experience on the platform is.
DEXs themselves can’t figure out what’s happening in the market or how much a token costs on their own. They rely on oracles like Pyth and Chainlink. The system feed DEXs with intelligence. Now, a faulty oracle can make a DEX experience feel messy. So, ensure to trade on a DEX using a reputable oracle.
Another key thing to understand is cross-chain liquidity. This simply means moving assets from one chain to another. Most DEXs are not on a single chain like Ethereum. Some operate across multiple chains. So, they need things like bridges or messaging layers like LayerZero to easily move funds. This interconnected approach is what makes DEXs different from CEXs.
Trading on a DEX doesn’t mean no fees. You either pay a network fee or a gas fee, which depends on the chain you’re using. Ethereum costs more. If you’re looking for low-fee options, consider platforms on chains like Solana and Arbitrum.
It’s also key to understand what slippage is when using a DEX, cause it could be a common experience. Slippage happens when a trade affects price movement, especially if there’s low liquidity. Now, this price change leads to impermanent loss for liquidity providers. It’s when the price changes after you provide liquidity.
Choosing a DEX isn’t rocket science, but it can feel overwhelming if you’re just starting. First thing to understand is that DEXs are different. Some are good if all you want is security. Others, like Hyperliquid, offer good liquidity. Here’s a checklist for choosing a good DEX.
1. Security and Audits – DEXs have become major targets for hackers, meaning your first question when choosing a DEX has to be “Is this platform safe”? To answer that question, look at their history. Have they been hacked? Do they have a good audit history? Are there bounty programs? All of these help you decide how safe the DEX is.
2. Liquidity and Volume – A platform with deep liquidity is what you need if your goal is fast execution. If that’s you, check for platforms with deep liquidity pools; this helps reduce slippage.
3. Supported Networks and Tokens – The best DEX platforms support multiple chains, which is what you need. Chains like Ethereum, Solana, and Arbitrum are popular choices. Platforms with broad network support offer more pairs and are generally more flexible.
4. User Experience and Wallet Support – You need a DEX that is compatible with your wallet. Also, some interfaces are best kept for experts, meaning it could be frustrating for a beginner to use them. Look out for the ease of use before choosing any DEX.
5. Fees and Gas Optimization – Fees can quietly stack up when using a DEX. Most DEXs charge trading fees and require you to pay gas fees. Others have some extra costs that you need to be aware of, so you do not eat into your profit.
6. Governance and Decentralization Score – Some DEXs offer governance tokens, which means holders can vote and contribute to platform upgrades. That’s a good way to check how decentralized a DEX is.
7. Integration with the DeFi Ecosystem –
The best DEXs are those that are well-connected to other DeFi protocols and ecosystems, such as:
The more connected the DEX, the more relevant it is.
It’s 2026, and there are a lot of changes happening around the DEX market. These are changes you should be aware of if your goal is to make the most of your experience.
Platforms like GMX are taking decentralized trading beyond swaps. They now offer both spot and perpetual trading. Some currently rank among the best places for leverage trading. If your goal is advanced tools, these are good places to search.
For active and professional traders, orderbook DEXs are changing the game. Platforms like Hyperliquid offer deep liquidity that feels like trading on a CEX. They offer good speed and keep everything decentralized.
Interoperability layers like IBC and Layerzero are solving one of the oldest problems in DEX trading. That’s liquidity fragmentation. Thanks to their role, you no longer need to stay on one network, meaning you can enjoy the best of what all networks offer. Interchain trading is a trend to watch out for in 2026.
Privacy will dominate the headline in 2026. Some DEXs use zero-knowledge systems to keep details of your trades private. Privacy will matter more as on-chain activity grows.
DEXs have their advantages and risks as well. Their biggest concern comes from smart contracts. Although audits help, they don’t completely guarantee a smart contract’s safety.
Cross-chain bridges are also a notable weakness, as we saw in the Ronin bridge hack of 2022. Most hacks happen at the bridge layer, not even the bridge itself. Flash loan attacks and rug pulls are still a concern, especially on newer DEXs.
Overall, using a platform with transparency signals helps to increase your sense of safety.
Using a DEX can seem overwhelming at first, especially if you’re just starting out. But with constant practice, it could easily become second nature. Here’s a quick breakdown of what the process feels like. To keep it simple, we’ll use Uniswap as our example:
1. Once you’ve decided on a platform to use, go to their website and connect your wallet.
2. Next, select the network and asset pair you want to trade. If your wallet is on the wrong chain, your trade won’t go through. Make sure to verify these little details. Afterwards, select the token you want to swap from and what you want to receive.
3. Enter the amount and review fees. Once you do this, Uniswap will automatically calculate what you’ll receive based on available liquidity. Now, you must review the gas fees and slippage. Higher slippage could mean getting worse prices, especially if the market is highly volatile.
4. Click swap if all you want is to swap, and confirm the transaction in your wallet. The funds will arrive shortly after that.
You can decide to earn fees by providing liquidity. The process is also simple. You only have to deposit two tokens in a fixed ratio into a pool. Afterwards, you get a share of the fees generated by the pool.
DEXs and centralized exchanges (CEXs) are not the same. Each has its own user type and is designed to meet certain needs. If your preference is custody, a DEX works for you. If you want faster trades and deep liquidity, CEXs offer that easily.
Neither is better than the others. Instead, both excels in various areas. Everything depends on your trading needs. CEXs offer a more controlled environment, better customer support and compliance.
The answer comes down to what you want, your experience level. If you’re just starting, you need a platform you can actually use and good liquidity. For more active traders, focus on getting a low-cost platform so you do not spend your gains on fees.
If you trade stablecoins, platforms with deep pools should be your goal. For advanced traders, I recommend orderbook DEXs.
Here’s the golden rule: Never choose a platform based on hype or popularity. Ensure the platform has a good security history. Overall, it should cater to your needs.