LUNC News: Top Validator Flags Controversial Terra Luna Classic Proposal

The move by some community members to create a Sub DAO in the Terra Luna Classic (LUNC) ecosystem has met with strong criticism
By Godfrey Benjamin
LUNC News: Validator Flags New Terra Luna Classic Proposal

Highlights

  • A new Sub DAO proposal is live for voting in the Terra Luna Classic community
  • Known validator has named key issues with the current proposal and dangers if passed
  • LUNC Price remains in the spotlight amid push for stabilized ecosystem

In recent developments, a major disagreement has been brewing in the Terra Luna Classic (LUNC) community after a popular validator, MrDiamondhandz, strongly opposed a new governance proposal. 

In an X post, MrDiamondhandz, who runs LuncLiveOrg, called the proposal one of the worst in recent times. He warned that it could have serious consequences for the network if approved.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Terra Classic Proposal for Sub DAOs

The governance proposal under criticism seeks to create a Terra Classic Sub-DAO. This proposal hinges on plans to decentralize decision-making processes within the LUNC ecosystem. 

It also suggests creating a special team to respond to emergencies without waiting for full governance approval. The goal is to make decision-making faster and more efficient.

However, this proposal has spurred mixed reactions among community members. Critics claim it could grant excessive, unchecked power to a select group and undermine the blockchain’s decentralized ethos. 

Similarly, critics fear that bypassing traditional governance mechanisms could lead to decisions misaligned with the broader interests of the LUNC ecosystem.

Notably, the proposal has garnered 39.41% approval, 7.95% opposition, and 25.47% votes marked as “No with veto.” The voter turnout is 28.95%, falling short of the 40% quorum required for passage.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Terra Luna Classic Proposal Pushback

MrDiamondhandz has emerged as a vocal critic of the proposal. In an X post, he termed it a realistic effort to develop centralized legitimacy under the pretense of decentralization. 

Meanwhile, a LUNC Telegram group screenshot has added to the debate. In the chat, a community member said they might leave the blockchain if the proposal fails. Another user agreed, raising concerns that the issue could split the community.  

Speaking on the above, MrDiamondhandz pointed out that some supporters of the proposal have even threatened to leave if it does not pass. However, he firmly believes their departure would benefit the Terra Luna Classic network.

Unfortunately, this dissension comes as the Terra Luna Classic (LUNC) community recently celebrated a major achievement. Reports show that the total number of LUNC tokens burned in the network has passed 400 billion.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Market Reaction and LUNC Price Outlook

It is worth mentioning that despite market volatility and controversy, LUNC’s price has stayed relatively stable, with no significant fluctuations observed. 

However, Investors closely monitor the situation, as substantial governance changes could influence market sentiment. As of this report, Terra Classic was trading at $0.00006361, increasing by 1.11% in the last 24 hours.

In related news, CoinGape reported that the Terra Luna Classic community is considering reducing the 21-day waiting period for withdrawing staked LUNC.

Advertisement
Godfrey Benjamin
Benjamin Godfrey is a blockchain enthusiast and journalists who relish writing about the real life applications of blockchain technology and innovations to drive general acceptance and worldwide integration of the emerging technology. His desires to educate people about cryptocurrencies inspires his contributions to renowned blockchain based media and sites. Benjamin Godfrey is a lover of sports and agriculture. Follow him on X, Linkedin
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.