Pro-XRP Lawyer Unveils SEC’s ‘Money Grab’ In Crypto Speech Fallout

Pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton unveils SEC's 'money grab' in crypto speech fallout, raising transparency concerns and regulatory uncertainties.
By Rupam Roy
Pro XRP Lawyer John Deaton Comments On Exchange Listings Of TRUMP Coin

Expressing strong criticism of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton condemns what he perceives as a blatant financial maneuver in the recent crypto speech, describing it as a ‘pure money grab’. Meanwhile, Deaton’s bold statements question the SEC’s motives, alleging a lack of transparency and highlighting a broader issue of corruption in the regulatory landscape.

Notably, the post sheds light on a contentious era where conflicts of interest and improprieties seem to be the norm.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Pro-XRP Lawyer John Deaton Slams SEC

John Deaton has recently made a post on the X platform, which reflects a deep skepticism towards the SEC’s actions. In his post, he emphasized that he would have sued SEC the same way it did for Ripple if the case was against Ethereum, Consensys, Ethereum Co-founder and Consensys founder Joseph Lubin, Vitalik Buterin, “alleging ETH was a security”.

Meanwhile, he points to a broader context, labeling the current period as the “Corruption Era,” citing instances of alleged corruption involving prominent political figures. In addition, John Deaton contends that this environment enables regulatory officials to provide favorable advantages to those influencing them, with little scrutiny from mainstream media.

According to Deaton, the Director of Corporation Finance wouldn’t hesitate to provide regulatory advantages to those funding him, even allowing them to contribute to the speech and subsequently work for them. This, he argues, is symptomatic of an era marked by a blatant disregard for conflicts of interest.

Also Read: BlackRock Triumphs With $260 Mln Inflow As Grayscale’s Total Outflow Exceeds $3 Bln

Advertisement
Advertisement

SEC Hearings and the Omission of ‘Sufficiently Decentralized’ Test

John Deaton’s sentiments find resonance in a post shared by renowned crypto lawyer MetaLawMan. The post questions the SEC’s selective omissions during Coinbase and Binance hearings, specifically the absence of any mention of Bill Hinman’s creation of the “sufficiently decentralized” test. Notably, the post, according to MetaLawMan, implies a lack of transparency and raises concerns about the SEC’s handling of guidance related to crypto token classification.

During the hearings, the SEC highlighted the benefits of its guidance on analyzing whether crypto tokens are securities but conveniently left out any reference to Bill Hinman’s “sufficiently decentralized” test, creating an air of inconsistency and potential bias in their regulatory approach.

Deaton’s outspoken criticism and MetaLawMan’s pointed observations underline a growing skepticism regarding the SEC’s regulatory practices within the crypto space. As the crypto community grapples with evolving regulations, the need for transparency, fairness, and consistent guidelines becomes increasingly evident. The unfolding narrative raises critical questions about the role of regulatory bodies and their accountability in shaping the future of the cryptocurrency industry.

Also Read: Shiba Inu Burn Rate Spikes 400% Amid 4 Tln SHIB Whale Activity

Advertisement
Rupam Roy
Rupam is a seasoned professional with three years of experience in the financial market, where he has developed a reputation as a meticulous research analyst and insightful journalist. He thrives on exploring the dynamic nuances of the financial landscape. Currently serving as a sub-editor at Coingape, Rupam's expertise extends beyond conventional boundaries. His role involves breaking stories, analyzing AI-related developments, providing real-time updates on the crypto market, and presenting insightful economic news. Rupam's career is characterized by a deep passion for unraveling the complexities of finance and delivering impactful stories that resonate with a diverse audience.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.