Ripple Vs SEC: Watchdog Submits Hinman Memos To Defend Claim

The court asked the SEC to submit internal documents to justify its claim that the Hinman memos are protected by attorney client privilege.
By Ashish Kumar
US SEC Submits Appeal Brief To Challenge Ripple's XRP Sales Ruling

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finally submitted the documents related to Bill Hinman’s infamous 2018 Ethereum (ETH) speech for in camera review. The commission mentioned that the memos submitted are under three different categories.

Advertisement
Advertisement

SEC submits memos under 3 categories

The court on June 14, 2022 asked the SEC to tender the internal documents to justify its assertion that they are protected under attorney client privilege. The regulator added that the submitted documents include 10 exemplar documents listed in “Attachment 1”. These memos were also mentioned in the commission’s letter for partial reconsideration.

The SEC had used every tactic in the books to shield the Hinman’s Speech documents. In the latest submission, the commission has put the document in three sections. The first set includes David Frederickson’s emails communicating about legal issues for the Speech. This also contains drafts of legal advice given to Hinman related to the speech contents. David Frederickson was working as the Chief Counsel for the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance.

While the second category of memos is emails from June 2018. These were sent by Michael Seaman (Hinman’s Counsel) to Hinman, Frederickson, and Szczepanik. The email carries an attachment of speech drafts with implemented legal advice from different SEC divisions. The staff of Trading & Markets (TM) and Investment Managemen (IM) were also involved.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Will Court accept Watchdog’s assertion?

The last category holds emails of attorneys from TM, IM, and OGC with the draft Seaman sent to Hinman. The draft was sent on June 11, 2018. This also includes the email with a draft of the refined language related to legal issues.

Now, as the court has obtained the required document, SEC’s fresh assertion will be challenged. The in camera review will lead the lawsuit towards the clarity over the speech made by Hinman on June 14. 2018. The speech allegedly directed that the Ethereum (ETH) is not the security under the consideration of the authority.

Advertisement
Ashish Kumar
Ashish believes in Decentralisation and has a keen interest in evolving Blockchain technology, Cryptocurrency ecosystem, and NFTs. He aims to create awareness around the growing Crypto industry through his writings and analysis. When he is not writing, he is playing video games, watching some thriller movie, or is out for some outdoor sports. Reach me at [email protected]
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.