XRP Lawsuit: Does the SEC opposition to Ripple’s seal nullify settlement speculations?

By Sunil Sharma
SEC

The latest XRP lawsuit development saw the SEC file an opposition to Ripple’s Motion to seal exhibits. SEC stated that Ripple’s seal seeks to permanently redact portions of the SEC’s Motion to Compel in the Slack data dispute. Additionally, Ripple also aims to seal in their entirety seven exhibits the SEC filed under seal to back its Motion to Compel.

The SEC has argued that the defendant’s Motion to Seal fails to meet the criteria set forth in the Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga. The criteria require sealing of “judicial documents” to be “narrowly tailored”. However, Ripple is demanding a “blanket seal” from public presumption, regardless of the high level of public interest in the case.

“Given the extraordinary level of public interest and high stakes of litigation, Defendants frequently comment publicly on the merits and substance of this lawsuit…But this makes strict adherence to the very narrow sealing standard set forth in Lugosch ever more important. Defendants would exercise their First Amendment right to speak freely about the lawsuit, but then deny the public the right under the same Amendment to access materials the Court is considering in ruling on the parties’ motion.”, SEC stated in the opposition letter to Motion to seal.

Advertisement
Advertisement

SEC revealed surprising data in Opposition to Motion Challenging DPP misuse

In the SEC’s former filing of opposition against Individual Defendants’ Motion challenging the SEC’s improper assertion of the Deliberative Process and other privileges (DPP), the plaintiff mentioned Hinman’s meeting with the defendants. The plaintiff highlighted that Ripple has stroked the most probative evidence, i.e., former SEC Division of Corporation Finance Director, William Hinman’s deposition testimony that he met with Ripple representatives.

In the mentioned meeting, Hinman asserted that he alerted against Ripple’s sales of XRP by defining them as sales of securities. He further advised Ripple to stop the unregistered sales. After Hinman and Ripple’s meeting data disclosure, it now appears that the SEC has the ball in its court. However, the defendant’s response remains unclear as of now. Ripple, that until now appeared to have the winning stance in the lawsuit, could be pleading for a settlement soon.

Advertisement
Sunil Sharma
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.