XRP Vs. SEC: Ripple Faces New Class Action for Unregistered XRP Offerings

Ripple Labs faces a new lawsuit for unregistered XRP sales in California, challenging digital asset regulations and securities laws.
By Maxwell Mutuma

Highlights

  • Ripple Labs Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit for allegedly violating securities laws with XRP sales.
  • The lawsuit claims Ripple sold XRP without necessary registration, breaking federal and California laws.
  • Class action members have until April 5 to opt out and pursue independent legal actions.

Ripple Labs Inc., its CEO, Bradley Garlinghouse, and subsidiary XRP II, LLC, find themselves at the center of a class action lawsuit. Filed in the Northern District of California, the lawsuit accuses the San Francisco-based fintech company of violating federal and California securities laws by offering and selling the digital asset XRP without the necessary registration. This case underscores the ongoing scrutiny and regulatory challenges facing the cryptocurrency industry, particularly regarding the classification and sale of digital assets.

The plaintiffs allege that Ripple engaged in the unauthorized sale of XRP, circumventing the registration requirements mandated by both federal and state securities laws. This legal challenge aims to represent two distinct groups: the Federal Securities Claims Class and the California State Securities Claims Class. These classes include individuals and entities who purchased XRP between July 3, 2017, and June 30, 2023, either retained the asset or sold it at a loss. Ripple and the co-defendants have countered these allegations, asserting that XRP does not constitute a security and, therefore, does not require registration.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Legal Implications and XRP’s Defense

The lawsuit leaves Ripple in a tight spot as it tackles the intricate regulatory environment of digital currencies. The main defense approach of Ripple is based on the claim that XRP, a digital currency used for global transactions, should not be considered a security. The importance of this criterion is significant, for the classification of XRP as security would demand a lot of strict regulatory requirements and scrutiny. The result of this legal fight could be used as a benchmark for treating digital assets in the US, thereby – affecting the regulation of other cryptocurrencies.

Investors and parties affected by the lawsuit have to make vital choices concerning their legal rights and options. The last date for class action members who want to exclude themselves from the lawsuit is April 5. Opt-out would allow these persons and institutions to bring individual proceedings against Ripple independently to get compensation. This decision point highlights the wider implications of the lawsuit to Ripple, not only but also to the investors and the digital currency market.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Broader Context and the Ripple vs. SEC Legal Feud

The class action lawsuit against Ripple unfolds in the backdrop of its continued legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The suit by the SEC against Ripple filed in December 2020 also claims that the company carried out an unregistered securities offering of $1.3 billion by selling XRP. The legal issues Ripple has been dealing with represent the regulatory ambiguities the whole cryptocurrency industry is trying to battle and show the requirement for explicit policies and frameworks governing digital assets.

The motion that Kraken, a leading digital asset exchange, had recently submitted for dismissing the SEC lawsuit is now adding another layer to the narrative on digital asset regulation. Kraken’s motion alludes to Judge Torres’ ruling concerning programmatic sales and represents the sophisticated legal tactics used by participants in the cryptocurrency community to deal with regulatory scrutiny. The situation described in this way by the lawyer named Bill Morgan gives us an idea of the Ripple vs. Kraken situation so that Kraken’s action may decrease the chance of settlement. SEC case, focusing on the possibility of an appeal by the SEC.

Read Also: Cardano Expands Ecosystem with Midnight: What Will it Offer?

Advertisement
Maxwell Mutuma
Maxwell is a crypto-economic analyst and Blockchain enthusiast, passionate about helping people understand the potential of decentralized technology. I write extensively on topics such as blockchain, cryptocurrency, tokens, and more for many publications. My goal is to spread knowledge about this revolutionary technology and its implications for economic freedom and social good.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.