Best Institutional Custody Solutions for Tokenized Assets in 2026

We reviewed over 25 institutional custody platforms and narrowed our list to the top 8 based on the CoinGape review methodology, which evaluates core factors like security architecture, regulatory standing, tokenized support, insurance coverage, and real institutional fit. These aren’t the biggest or most popular names. Instead, they are the ones that actually hold up when institutions put serious capital behind them.

Coinbase Custody has spent 12+ years building its key management and cold storage technology in-house. As a New York state-chartered trust company and Qualified Custodian under NY banking law, Coinbase Custody is a well-known custody provider that is regulatory compliant and suitable for US asset managers, ETFs, and institutional funds.

Coinbase doesn’t only offer compliance, it also excels at security. It stands out for its Vault storage model. This system combines physical security, consensus computation, and strict process controls. At the end, it gives institutions something more defensible than standard cold storage. Plus, there’s also the Prime On-chain Wallet integration, which means clients can interact with smart contracts and DeFi without pulling assets out of custody. 

The US has only one federally chartered crypto bank and that’s Anchorage Digital. It’s not marketing, but pure facts. Since receiving its OCC national trust charter in 2021, Anchorage has built the kind of regulatory infrastructure that most institutional crypto custodians are still trying to catch up to. It’s not just about compliance though.

Anchorage processes 90% of transactions in under 20 minutes, which, for institutional custody, is genuinely fast. The biometric voice and video authorization layer also addresses something most custodian ignore: human error is often the biggest attack vector, and not the tech. 

Anchorage currently has an impressive momentum. Tether made a strategic equity investment in Anchorage Digital in early 2026. This put a $4.2 billion valuation on the company, which I think is a strong show of institutional confidence. Plus, Anchorage has a custody relationship with BlackRock, which covers spot crypto ETPs with over $50 billion in AUM. This alone puts it in a different tier from most crypto custody providers. Read our coverage of BlackRock tapping Anchorage for custody. 

BitGo has been offering institutional custody services since 2013, long before most of the platforms on this list even existed. BitGo invented multi-signature wallet technology, has processed over $3 trillion in lifetime transactions, and has never experienced a single loss due to hacking. That track record matters a lot when you’re an institution deciding who holds your assets.

BitGo covers more tokenized assets than most custodians on this list, around 1,500 assets across 60+ chains. BitGo integrates directly with issuers like Ark21Shares, HashDex, and Valkyrie. With BitGo, institutions can custody tokenized securities, funds, and RWAs while integrating staking, lending, and trading workflows. BitGo has a conditional OCC national bank charter in hand. With that, it is quickly closing the regulatory gap with Anchorage. See how the SEC’s custody guidance directly names BitGo as a qualified custodian. 

Fireblock is not just a digital assets custodian. Think of it as more of an infrastructure layer that a lot of the crypto world runs on. Over $10 trillion in total digital asset transfers have moved through Fireblocks, and more than 2,400 organizations rely on the platform include banks, neobanks, ETF issuers, and prime brokers. What makes Fireblock really different from most crypto custodians is that it combines MPC-based security with a granular policy engine that lets institutions define exactly who can move what, when, and how.

Fireblocks Trust Company, its NYDFS-chartered qualified custody arm, was launched in 2024 and has already brought on heavy clients like Galaxy, FalconX, Bakkt, and Castle Island. Fireblock helps institutions manage tokenized securities, RWA, and traditional finance. Chainlink and Fireblocks are currently helping banks issue stablecoins, which shows how deeply important Fireblock is to institutions.

Fidelity Digital Assets is one of the top tokenized assets custody solutions for investment advisors, pension funds, and family offices interested in digital assets custody. Fidelity has been building an infrastructure for tokenized assets custody since 2014, meaning its whole operations reflect TradFi DNA.

In terms of security, Fidelity has both SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type II audits by a Big Four firm. It uses cold-vault storage, with 24/7 on-site security, multi-person and multi-organization access controls for advanced protection. They also launched FIDD, its own stablecoin built on Ethreum. This move shows that Fidelity’s ambition in tokeinized assets is beyond providing custody. 

Komainu is built from scratch for tokenized asset custody. It offers a bank-grade RWA custody specifically for financial institutions like banks operating across regulated markets. Komainu has a custody model for tokenized RWAs that focuses more on segregated, on-chain wallets that keep client assets off-balance sheet and bankruptcy-remote.

The crypto custody provider uses a strong combination of MPC and HSM architectures to support crypto and tokenized assets such as funds, bonds, and RWAs, while offering on-chain visibility, strong governance controls, and regulatory oversight in multiple jurisdictions. 

Zodia Custody is what you get when banking giants decide to build a custody solution that understands the needs of financial institutions. The platform is backed by Standard Chartered, Northern Trust, SBI Holdings, National Australia Bank, and Emirates NBD, which means it has institutional credibility that most crypto-native platforms spend years building.

Zodia was FCA-registered from the start and has strong regulatory coverage in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. It is one of the best crypto custody providers for financial institutions. Zodia’s air-gapped storage solutions with 24/7 instant withdrawal are a rare combination. Most cold storage solutions trade speed for security. Zodia built both. It also supports crypto and tokenized assets, including bonds, funds, and RWAs, while enabling trading, staking directly rom custody. 

Copper is one of those crypto custody providers that doesn’t always get the headlines, but is behind a lot of institutional crypto activities. Its ClearLoop off-exchange settlement is what truly makes Copper different. It allows institutions trade across 50+ exchanges without needing to take funds away from custody. There’s no prefunding or counterparty exposure, which is really impressive.

Copper is best used by hedge funds, trading firms, ETP issuers, and foundations. Security on this platform is also impressive. Copper eliminates a single point of failure by splitting wallet control into three shards (Client, Copper, Trusted Third-Party) and uses a 2-of-3 signing quorum. Copper also supports hot, cold, and warm vaults or flexibility.

Safety is a priority in the digital assets market. But the truth is that tokenized assets are only as safe as the infrastructure holding them. Here are a couple of reasons why institutional crypto custody is a must for institutional players: 

1. Ownership Protection and Private Key Security

Private keys are the main assets when it comes to digital assets. Losing your private keys means losing your asset. Institutional custody solutions help with this. For example, MPC custody shares key control across several parties. This system eliminates a single point of failure, as we see with self-custody. 

2. Regulatory and Fiduciary Compliance Requirements

Compliance is a serious demand in this tokenized asset market. Risking it means the possibility of lawsuits and even shutdowns. Qualified custodians handle all those headaches for their clients. They meet regulatory demand across key jurisdictions to offer protection to investors. 

3. Institutional Risk Management and Asset Segregation

Institutional custody is set in a way that a client’s asset is protected if the custodian becomes insolvent. For example, compliance demands that assets are held in segregated, insolvency-remote structures. 

4. Integration with Tokenization Platforms and Asset Segregation 

Tokenized securities and RWAs require custody systems that integrate with issuers, transfer agents, trading venues, and compliance tooling. 

We reviewed over 25+ institutional crypto custodians and narrowed the list to 8 based on the CoinGape review methodology. We assessed each platform across seven core criteria: 

• Security architecture (MPC, HSM, cold storage model), 
• Regulatory standing and qualified custodian status. 

We only included platforms that have an active institutional client base.

Different rules apply for crypto custody across different jurisdictions. You need to understand what applies in core markets like the US and the EU to stay safe. Here’s what you need to know about regulatory requirements across different regions: 

United States – The SEC runs the show for tokenized assets in the United States. Under its rules, RIAs can’t pick just any custody provider. That provider has to be a regulated entity like a national bank, state trust, or OCC-chartered institution. There are also reporting standards to comply with. 

Europe and Global Custody Regulations – MiCA is the rulebook for the EU. It covers everything from digital assets to custodians. However, the Uk has its own rulebook. It sits outside MiCA entirely. The FCA has its own processes. Platforms like Zodia hold both licenses, which is what you need if your work spans both the UK and the EU. 

Compliance Requirements for Tokenized Asset Custody – Tokenized securities don’t get a lighter touch because they stay on the blockchain. Once an asset is classified as a security, and in most jurisdictions most tokenized assets are, they come under the same laws as traditional assets like stock.

Most people are caught in between deciding between self-custody and institutional custody. Now, both have their pros and cons, which you must know to fully decide what works best for you: 

Institutional crypto custody is the foundation that makes it possible for institutional clients to participate in the digital assets market. Every tokenized bond, treasury, fund, and RWA that moves on-chain needs a regulated, secure, and compliant custodian behind it. Here’s how to decide the best fit: 

• Best for regulated US institutions: Coinbase Custody and Fidelity Digital Assets both hold OCC national bank charters and satisfy SEC qualified custodian requirements. Both offer really clean compliance structures for US-based asset managers and investment advisers. 
• Best for tokenized assets: Fireblocks and Komainu lead here. Fireblocks has one of the deepest tokenization infrastructure integrations with Canton Network, Chainlink, and Figment. Likewise, Komainu is one of the largest custodian for BlackRock’s BUIDL fund, and it’s roles in accepting tokenized MMFs as collateral makes it a strong option for tokenized asset custody. 
• Best for banks and asset managers: I recommend Anchorage Digital here. It holds the only OCC federal bank charter in crypto, serves BlackRock and PayPal, and also combines fiat and crypto custody on a single platform. This is exactly what banks and large asset managers need. For EMEA-based banking institutions, I recommend Zodia Custody. 
• Best for tokenization platforms: BitGo is the best custody provider for this category. It covers over 1,550+ assets and has deep integration with ETF issuers, RWA protocols, and settlement infrastructure. This makes it one of the most versatile custody platforms for clients building tokenized products at a large scale. 

The bottom line: Secure infrastructure, regulatory compliance, and institutional-grade custody are important for the future of tokenized assets and global capital markets.