Your Vote
Decides
Web3's Best

Fed Independence at Risk? Lummis and Hassett Discuss Powell Probe Amid Extravagant Spending Claims

Coingapestaff
24 hours ago
Coingapestaff

Coingapestaff

Journalist
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Read full bio
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Fed

Highlights

  • Hassett says DOJ review targets Fed spending, not rate policy interference..
  • He rejects market risk claims, citing project costs near $10B to $20B.
  • Lummis demands answers from Powell; Warren warns of political pressure on Fed.

White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett defended the DOJ scrutiny linked to Fed Chair Jerome Powell and framed it as a basic review of spending. He said extreme building costs justify federal investigation, even as critics warn it could pressure the central bank.

Hassett Dismisses Fed Independence Fears Over DOJ Review

CBC News reported that Hassett claimed that the problem was to be considered in the context of tension surrounding the U.S. interest rates. He admitted that the administration has been putting pressure on the rate policy. Nevertheless, he referred to the case as supervision, rather than intervention.

Reporter questioned on whether the investigation would weaken Fed independence and destabilize markets. He dismissed that worry and indicated the magnitude of the cost issue. He remarked that when a project related to the government amounts to $10-billion or even $20-billion, it would be right to the federal authorities to take a look at what occurred.

He claimed that the Justice Department is seemingly attempting to get to the bottom of why the Federal Reserve building project has become so costly. Hassett has referred to it as vastly more expensive than other constructions in Washington. He also said that in the case that he is in the position of Powell, he would have the investigators go over the spending and explain how the money was used.

Lummis Presses Powell as Warren Calls Probe a Power Grab

Sen. Cynthia Lummis took the accountability framing. Punchbowl News reported that the Wyoming Republican stated that Powell was not worthy of any sympathy as the investigation continues. She claimed that taxpayer has a right to know how the Fed spent money.

Lummis stated that the dispute is leaving two outcomes. She claimed that Powell had not been ready in a testimony or that he had knowingly lied to the legislators regarding lavish spending. Lummis made an addition that she will not say any more until the DOJ issues its findings.

Democrats pushed back hard. Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat of the Senate Banking Committee, stated that the situation is political misuse of federal power. She alleged that President Donald Trump had misused DOJ power to make the Fed act in his favor.

Warren cautioned that the strategy would put a strain on the central bank independence. She claimed that it would render Fed policy to respond to political influence instead of economic data. Warren also hinted that this kind of pressure might undermine market confidence.

Advertisement
coingape google news

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more… to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

Newsletter
Your crypto brief.
Delivered every day.
  • Insights that move markets
  • 100,000 active subscribers
By signing-up you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.
Your Vote
Decides
Web3's Best
Cross