Claim BonusRipple Blasts SEC For ‘Unprecedented’ Ask In Latest Response
After the SEC’s appeal to seal its response to amici motion related to Daubert challenge, Ripple responded sharply`. Addressing Judge Torres of the Southern District Court of New York, the Ripple team said that facts do not support SEC’s claims. The factual record in the pending SEC request does not support the extraordinary relief, Ripple said.
SEC’s Request To Seal Information On Experts
After requesting to seal information about Expert 1, the SEC has also informed that the sealing should be extended to three other experts. Not only does the commission wants their names and associated information undisclosed, it also wants any motion of the substance of their reports hidden. This is until the motion around first expert is resolved.
Ripple stated that the point of Daubert motion is to question the reliability and admissibility of an expert report. The SEC’s request effectively means that the entire motion for the four experts have to be filed and kept sealed. Ripple criticized the SEC’s moves as opposing the public right to have access to substantive materials.
“The SEC’s attempt to suppress criticisms of its expert opinions is particularly egregious. Given that none of the SEC’s expert reports is likely to contain SEC confidential information. The only confidential information is internal information about Ripple itself and third parties.”
‘SEC’s Unprecedented & Unsupported Attempts’
The Ripple team described the Securities and Exchange Commission’s actions as ‘unprecedented’ and ‘unsupported’. The commission’s attempts to shield identities and opinions from public scrutiny are not backed by any evidence, Ripple explained. Last month, the SEC briefed the court over leaving to file an amicus reply, to which Ripple demanded that the reply be made public.
The court, however, ordered the SEC to make its case as to why the records need to be sealed. To justify its position on sealing, the court asked SEC to make its point by June 14 without further delay.
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more… to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Delivered every day.
- Insights that move markets
- 100,000 active subscribers
Related Articles
- Bitcoin Rises to $94k as Trump Signals Alternatives Ahead of Supreme Court Tariffs Ruling
- Rick Rieder’s Fed Chair Odds Rise as BlackRock CIO Calls for Rates to Fall to 3%
- Fed Rate Cut: Trump Calls for Powell to Lower Rates After Soft CPI Inflation Report
- Breaking: U.S. CPI Inflation Comes In At 2.7%, Bitcoin Rises
- Bitget Launches One-Click Bot Copying for Crypto Users as Algorithmic Trading Goes Mainstream
- Bitcoin Price Eyes $100k as Core US Inflation Slips Ahead of CLARITY Act Markup
- Why Is MSTR Stock Price Down Despite Recent Bitcoin Purchase
- Pi Coin Price Prediction: How Mainnet Migration and New Tokens Supply Could Affect Pi Network?
- Crypto Stocks To Watch: MSTR, Metaplanet, and S&P 500 price
- Solana Price Targets $200 as WisdomTree Declares Its Dominance Structural
- Bitcoin Price Prediction Amid DOJ Probe as Powell Indictment Fears Cool
