White House Proposes Stablecoin Rewards Compromise as CLARITY Act Odds Drop to 44%

Coingapestaff
4 hours ago
Coingapestaff

Coingapestaff

Journalist
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Read full bio
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
White House backs idle-yield ban in CLARITY Act talks

Highlights

  • White House backs CLARITY Act compromise banning stablecoin yields on idle holdings.
  • White House-led session narrows debate to activity-based rewards, aiming for compromise by March 1.
  • The odds of the CLARITY Act passing this year has dropped to 44% but since recovered to 52%.

The White House moved to break the stablecoin impasse last Friday at ETHDenver, proposing that holders cannot earn yields on idle coins under draft language tied to the CLARITY Act. Crypto Council Executive Director Patrick Witt outlined the compromise to industry and bank leaders after a closed-door session. The talks aim to resolve the rewards dispute by March 1 and restart Senate action.

CLARITY Act Talks Narrow Stablecoin Yield Provision

As per Crypto in America, the core compromise for the CLARITY Act is that firms would not offer yield on idle stablecoin balances. That objective, long pursued by crypto companies, is now effectively off the table. Instead, negotiators narrowed the debate to rewards tied to activity, such as transactions or network participation.

According to Witt, the gap between banks and crypto firms “shrunk considerably” after last week’s meeting. The White House digital assets adviser previously said that the recent closed-door meeting was a big step forward for stablecoin yield. 

The draft addressed concerns raised in a recent banking framework on stablecoin yield limits. Notably, any restrictions would be narrowly scoped. A banking source said the proposed anti-evasion language would allow the SEC, Treasury, and CFTC to enforce the idle-yield ban. Civil penalties could reach $500,000 per violation, per day.

Witt said ethics concerns tied to President Donald Trump’s family crypto dealings remain under discussion. However, he described them as less central than the CLARITY Act rewards issue. Once negotiators finalize language, the Senate Banking Committee could reschedule its postponed January 15 markup. Chairman Tim Scott will decide the timing.

Industry and Bank Groups Face Off

The session included representatives from Coinbase, Ripple, and Andreessen Horowitz. Last week, Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal said discussions around the crypto bill remained constructive and cooperative. Despite this, Polymarket odds on Clarity Act odds of passing fell to as low as 44% but have since recovered to 52% as the March 1 deadline approaches with no meaningful movement on a compromise.

Source: Polymarket

Trade groups Blockchain Association and Crypto Council for Innovation also attended. Bank perspectives came from the American Bankers Association, Bank Policy Institute, and Independent Community Bankers of America.

As Coingape reported, the third White House meeting on the CLARITY Act was held on Thursday, with Ripple, Coinbase, and bank representatives attending. Now, banks argue that rewards could pull deposits from traditional institutions and raise systemic risk. Meanwhile, crypto firms warn that broad restrictions would curb innovation and favor incumbents. The White House inserted itself more directly than in prior meetings to bridge that divide.

Witt told Crypto In America, officials seek a resolution by March 1 for the CLARITY Act. He said good-faith engagement could unlock faster movement. Much reconciliation between stakeholders is already happening in parallel.

Advertisement
coingape google news

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more… to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

Newsletter
Your crypto brief.
Delivered every day.
  • Insights that move markets
  • 100,000 active subscribers
By signing-up you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.