Samson Mow Calls Ethereum As ‘Stupid Man’s’ Bitcoin & XRP A ‘Tricky One’

Rupam Roy
January 19, 2024 Updated July 21, 2025
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

Samson Mow, recognized for his outspoken opinions in the cryptocurrency realm, has sparked debate by referring to Ethereum as the “stupid man’s Bitcoin.” However, Mow, who shared his unfiltered thoughts on the X platform, didn’t stop there.

When a user questioned the title for XRP holders, Mow intriguingly labeled it a “tricky one.” The cryptocurrency maverick continued his discourse, saying that Tether and MicroStrategy hold zero Ethereum, emphasizing the prevailing race to accumulate only Bitcoin. Notably, this bold perspective adds fuel to the ongoing debates within the crypto community.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Samson Mow Sees Ethereum As ‘Stupid Man’s Bitcoin”

In a bold declaration on the X platform, Samson Mow likened Ethereum to the “poor man’s gold,” drawing a parallel to silver’s relationship with gold. Meanwhile, Mow’s blunt assertion categorizing Ethereum as the “stupid man’s Bitcoin” has sparked debates within the crypto community.

Notably, the comparison sheds light on the ongoing rivalry between the two major cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin and Ethereum, and the varied opinions that often characterize this space.

In addition, addressing a user’s inquiry about XRP, Mow’s response, “That’s a tricky one,” adds an element of mystery to the dynamics surrounding Ripple’s native token. The crypto community is left to ponder the nuances of Mow’s perception of XRP, further intensifying the discourse on the diverse attributes of different digital assets.

Also Read: Ethereum Accumulations Soar As ETH Price Slips Below $2,500

Advertisement
Advertisement

Tether, MicroStrategy, And The Bitcoin-Only Race

Samson Mow’s recent critique extended beyond Ethereum, citing the crypto portfolio of major players like Tether and MicroStrategy. His post underscored the absence of Ethereum in the holdings of Tether and MicroStrategy, contrasting it with the race to accumulate Bitcoin.

Mow’s disdain for what he terms as “shilling shitcoins” by some ETF issuers highlights the ongoing struggle within the crypto industry to establish other altcoins’ dominance.

For context, Tether’s aggressive accumulation of Bitcoin during the Q4 2023 bull run, adding $380 million worth of BTC, has been a notable trend. As reported by CoinGape Media earlier, the stablecoin issuer now boasts a substantial 66,465 BTC, valued at approximately $2.8 billion.

Mow’s criticism echoes the sentiment within certain crypto circles that view Bitcoin as the unrivaled leader, while other assets, including Ethereum and XRP, grapple with diverse perceptions and critiques.

Samson Mow’s unfiltered remarks continue to stir conversations, showcasing the dynamic and often polarizing nature of discussions within the cryptocurrency community. As the crypto space evolves, perspectives like Mow’s contribute to the ongoing narrative surrounding the roles and values assigned to different digital assets in this ever-changing landscape.

Also Read: Oaktree Co-Founder Deems Bitcoin And Gold Equals In Intrinsic Value Debate

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
Rupam is a seasoned professional with three years of experience in the financial market, where he has developed a reputation as a meticulous research analyst and insightful journalist. He thrives on exploring the dynamic nuances of the financial landscape. Currently serving as a sub-editor at Coingape, Rupam's expertise extends beyond conventional boundaries. His role involves breaking stories, analyzing AI-related developments, providing real-time updates on the crypto market, and presenting insightful economic news. Rupam's career is characterized by a deep passion for unraveling the complexities of finance and delivering impactful stories that resonate with a diverse audience.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.