XRP News: Ripple CTO Holds Off RLUSD DeFi Bridge Plans Citing KelpDAO-Like Risks

Coingapestaff
Coingapestaff

Coingapestaff

Journalist
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Read full bio
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
XRP news. Ripple CTO RLUSD

Highlights

  • Ripple CTO shared his insights on evaluation of DeFi bridges for use by RLUSD stablecoin.
  • He cited a common pattern of DeFi bridges prioritising ease of expansion rather than strict protection.
  • Schwartz identified a similar trend in the recent $292 million KelpDAO hack.

Ripple CTO David Schwartz has expressed concerns about the integration of DeFi bridge infrastructure to support RLUSD. In XRP news today, he cited major security risks in DeFi protocols that could mirror the fate of the recent KelpDAO exploit.

XRP News: Ripple CTO Flags Security Risks in DeFi Bridges

On X, Schwartz revealed that he has evaluated several DeFi bridging systems for use by Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin. He noted that he was “exclusively focused on the security and risk aspect.”

His assessment on various onchain DeFi bridges shows that these protocols mostly had a strong foundation for security. They could avoid the type of KelpDAO faced. However, he pointed out a common problem with the deployments of these systems.

“They generally in effect recommended not bothering to use the most important security mechanisms because they have convenience and operational complexity costs,” the Ripple CTO wrote. He noted that ease of cross-chain expansion was frequently given priority sometimes at the cost of proper protection measures.

Moreover, Schwartz likened the pattern to that of the latest $292 million KelpDAO hack, per XRP news update. “I have a funny feeling part of the problem is going to be something like KelpDAO choosing not to use key LayerZero security features out of convenience,” Schwartz wrote.

Previously, XRPL validator Vet also flagged concerns on Solana’s wXRP. He noted that wXRP on Solana faces risks similar to the KelpDAO incident as issued tokens often bear counterparty risks.

Currently, XRPL validators are gearing up to vote on key lending protocol amendments. However, Flare Network founder Hugo Philion believes that it’s not much of use to XRP users as it doesn’t offer the opportunity to collateralize Ripple’s native token.

About $292M KelpDAO Attack

The recent crypto hack involved rsETH, a liquid restaking token connected to KelpDAO. On-chain records indicate that around 116,500 rsETH was eventually emptied. At the time, the KelpDAO attack losses were estimated to be around $292 million.

The exploiter then collateralized these tokens on Aave V3 to borrow large amounts of ETH and WETH. Blockchain tracking crypto tools show the funds were subsequently laundered through Tornado Cash to hide the trails of transactions.

XRP news
KelpDAO attacker’s transactions related to rsETH. Source: KelpDAO

The exploit seems to be a cross-chain messaging infrastructure connected to LayerZero. At 17:35 UTC, a wallet owned by an attacker made a call to the lzReceive function on the EndpointV2 contract. This move caused the release of the 116,500 rsETH to a different address held by the attacker.

After LayerZero released a report on the incident, Ripple CTO Schwartz made a change to his statement on the KelpDAO exploit. He said, “The attack was way more sophisticated than I expected and aimed at LayerZero infrastructure taking advantage of KelpDAO laziness.”

Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.
AD
BestChange

Instant Currency Exchange at BestChange with Ease

  • Compare Rates Across 1000+ Exchanges
  • Access 250+ Cryptocurrencies & Pairs
  • Save Time with Real-Time Price Tracking
BestChange
coingape google news

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more… to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

Newsletter
Your crypto brief.
Delivered every day.
  • Insights that move markets
  • 100,000 active subscribers
By signing-up you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.