Strategy, Metaplanet at Risk of Removal in MSCI’s Latest Index Eligibility Overhaul

Index giant MSCI has launched a formal public consultation that could strip Strategy (MSTR) and Metaplanet of their spots in its flagship Global Investable Market Indexes (GIMI).

Under the proposed MSCI non-operating company screen, both Bitcoin treasury firms fail key financial eligibility tests.

The development could trigger up to $2 billion in forced passive fund outflows if the rules are finalized in November 2026.

What MSCI’s Proposed Screen Would Mean for Bitcoin Treasury Firms

MSCI opened the consultation in early August 2026. It targets non-operating companies, defined as firms that accumulate non-operating assets rather than generating cash from core business activities.

The proposal applies a two-step test: a Core Screen checking whether operating assets exceed 50% of total assets, followed by an Exclusion Screen that flags companies failing at least four of five financial ratios.

Those include operating asset intensity, expense intensity, operating cash flow, non-operating fair value changes, and capital dependence.

Simulation results applied to May 2026 data flag three deletions from the MSCI ACWI IMI: Strategy (large-cap, ~$23.9B float-adjusted market cap), Metaplanet (~$654M), and UK uranium holding company Yellow Cake PLC.

Strategy reportedly fails all five financial screens based on its FY2025 filings. ETH treasury firm SharpLink and two others land on a new public watchlist, requiring two consecutive failures before removal.

Metaplanet posted $20M in H1 2026 profit despite the BTC price crash, yet its capital-raising model, primarily issuing equity and debt to accumulate Bitcoin, is precisely the structure MSCI’s screen is designed to identify.

Strategy has continued aggressively raising capital to fund its Bitcoin accumulation, netting 175K BTC versus just 7K sold.

That very playbook, continuous capital markets dependence, is what triggers the MSCI capital-dependence flag.

A Risk Deferred, Now Returned, and the Outflow Math Is Stark

This is not MSCI’s first move on the issue. In October 2025, MSCI initially proposed excluding Digital Asset Treasury Companies (DATCOs) from its indexes.
A proposal that rattled markets before MSCI shelved it in January 2026 after industry pushback. At that point, MSCI explicitly signaled a broader non-operating review was forthcoming.

For investors, the stakes are clear. Earlier projections pegged potential forced selling at $2.5B–$2.8B for Strategy alone.

Based on current pricing, that estimate now sits at $1.8B–$2.0B in potential outflows.

Passive funds and ETFs tracking MSCI benchmarks would face mandatory selling if Strategy or Metaplanet are dropped.

Metaplanet already navigated a period of billion-dollar unrealized losses on its Bitcoin treasury, an index exclusion would compound pressure on its stock price significantly.

The feedback window closes September 30, 2026. MSCI’s final methodology is expected October 16, with the index review set for November 11, 2026.

Current constituents get a two-year consecutive-failure buffer. A second failure in mid-2027 would seal the exit unless the methodology changes.

Strategy has also sold Bitcoin to repurchase its own STRC shares. That move further blurs its identity as a pure operating company in MSCI’s eyes.

The broader Bitcoin treasury model now faces its most structured institutional challenge yet. Public companies that issue debt and equity purely to accumulate BTC are squarely in the frame.

Other corporate Bitcoin treasury entrants like Trump Media continue piling into BTC. If this framework is adopted, they could land in MSCI’s crosshairs in future reviews.

MSCI’s source consultation is available at MSCI’s official consultation document.

Trade derivatives without intermediaries on a leading Perp DEX.