93% of Funded Prop Traders Never See a Payout. A New Report Explains Why

Lawrence Mike
July 23, 2026
Lawrence Mike

Lawrence Mike

Research and Product Analyst
Expertise : Scriptwriting, SEO, AI Prompting, Technical Writing
Lawrence Mike is a cryptocurrency analyst, writer, and storyteller with over 4 years of experience in blockchain and crypto markets. He has written more than 3,000 articles and scripts, covering news, SEO content, market insights, technical analysis, and alpha-generating strategies. Lawrence has contributed to Altcoin Buzz, Punch Newspapers, and BitcoinWisdom, and collaborated with leading exchanges like Binance and BYDFi. Holding a Master’s in Corporate Communications from Rome Business School, he specializes in breaking down complex crypto topics into clear, actionable insights for readers and traders alike.
Read full bio
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Funded Prop Traders

Prop trading has grown significantly over the last 5 years, but most traders still struggle to receive a payout. A new transparency report by Velotrade, based on observations of major prop trading firms, has concluded that only 7% of traders ever receive a payout, while 93% of traders who buy funded challenges don’t. The report argues that hidden trading rules, rather than skill alone, determine whether traders receive a payout.

Most Traders Don’t Fail Because They Can’t Trade

FPFX Tech analyzed over 300,000 trading accounts and gave some shocking conclusions. The result of that report, according to Finance Magnates, showed that only 14% of traders ever pass a challenge, and just 7% ever reach a payout. The average payout, when one arrives, is roughly 4% of the account’s value. FPFX Tech’s CEO has said the average funded trader lasts about 22 days before losing the account entirely.

This study clearly shows that not many traders find profit from prop trading. The big question is: why do most prop traders fail? Velotrade, a prop trading firm, recently released its 2026 Prop Firm Transparency Report. It reviewed the published rulebooks of six firms: Topstep, FTMO, FundingPips, Blue Guardian, HyroTrader, and Velotrade. At the end, the report concludes that most traders pay close attention to the profit split, which is not what decides payouts. Instead, the report argues that understanding a firm’s rules is just as important as generating profits.

As mentioned earlier, interest in prop trading has skyrocketed, making it important for traders to understand how profitable prop trading works. According to PropFirmApp, global monthly searches for “prop firm” grew from 880 in early 2020 to 49,500 in 2025. The growth in searches suggests that users are looking for more funded opportunities. So, beyond looking for “how to choose the best prop trading firm,” traders have to understand and compare platform rules.

Five Rules That Decide Whether You Get Paid

The Velotrade report analyzed the rules on some of the top prop trading platforms and found 5 major rules traders must look out for to know if they qualify for payouts. Drawdown models: this is the line that determines if your account succeeds or fails. A fixed drawdown never changes. Instead, it is set from your starting balance. On a $100,000 account with a 10% limit, the account fails at $90,000. A trailing drawdown rises with equity and never falls back. This explains why the same trading strategy can keep one funded account active while causing another to breach its drawdown limits. FTMO uses a fixed 10% limit; Topstep’s trailing limit locks at the starting balance end-of-day.

A separate analysis published by Arxum found that drawdown breaches account for most stage failures. Most traders lose their funded accounts because they break their risk limits and not because they failed to generate profit.

Consistency rules: This limits how much of your total profit can come from a single trading day. For example, if a platform has a 40% consistency rule, and a trader’s profit target is $1,000, earning $450 means that day’s profit accounts for 45% of the total profit. The trader could still fail the evaluation for breaking the consistency rule even if they reach the profit target.

According to the Velotrade report, Topstep, FundingPips, Blue Guardian, and HyroTrader apply versions of this rule, while FTMO has a 50% Best Day Rule on one of its account types, detailed in its help center

Floating loss limits: Some firms count unrealized losses, not just closed losses, towards a trader’s daily drawdown. This means a trade that’s temporarily in the red can breach a trader’s limit, even if it later recovers and closes in profit.

Per-trade risk caps: Some prop firms limit how much a single position can lose at any moment. These rules may apply once a trader gets funded and can combine losses from repeated trades in the same direction. For example, Blue Guardian’s Guardian Shield monitors unrealized losses, while HyroTrader requires trades to have a stop-loss within five minutes. Funded-stage rule changes: Passing an evaluation doesn’t always mean the trader has seen all platform rules. On some platforms, news trading and new restrictions on consistency apply after a trader gets a funded account. This means the rules on a live funded account could differ from those used during evaluation.

How SIX Top Prop Firms Compare on Rules

The report also compares how the prop trading rules apply on some of the top platforms.

Firms Drawdown Model Consistency Rule Position Risk Rule Rules Change After Funding
FTMO Fixed Yes (some accounts) No (standard accounts) Yes
Topstep Trailing Yes No formal cap Yes
FundingPips Mixed Yes Yes Yes
Blue Guardian Mixed Yes Yes Yes
HyroTrader Mixed Evaluation only Yes Yes
Velotrade Fixed None published None published No

Source: Adapted from Velotrade 2026 Prop Firm Transparency Report based on each firm’s published rule pages and help centre documentation. The full report also compares floating P&L treatment, news trading, weekend holding rules, and where each firm’s detailed trading rules are published.

The comparison table above shows how prop trading firms can apply different requirements even when offering similar funded accounts. Traders researching the best crypto prop trading firms should compare rulebooks across platforms, alongside payout splits, account sizes, and evaluation fees.

What to Check Before Buying a Challenge

The report recommends that traders spend a few minutes reviewing key areas before purchasing a funded challenge. Some of the key areas to consider include the drawdown model, consistency requirements, minimum trading days, first payout waiting period, withdrawal frequency, position risk limits, funded-stage rule changes, withdrawal conditions, and whether the platform publishes all account-ending rules in one location.

For traders deciding between different evaluation models, CoinGape’s guide to One-Step vs. Two-Step verification provides context on how challenge structures differ before selecting a platform.

Conclusion

The Velotrade Report argues that prop trading model (funded trading) is not the problem. Instead, most traders underestimate the importance of understanding different rules across platforms and how they govern payouts. The report concludes that traders should compare rulebooks alongside payout splits before purchasing a funded account.

coingape google news coingape google news
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
Lawrence Mike is a cryptocurrency analyst, writer, and storyteller with over 4 years of experience in blockchain and crypto markets. He has written more than 3,000 articles and scripts, covering news, SEO content, market insights, technical analysis, and alpha-generating strategies. Lawrence has contributed to Altcoin Buzz, Punch Newspapers, and BitcoinWisdom, and collaborated with leading exchanges like Binance and BYDFi. Holding a Master’s in Corporate Communications from Rome Business School, he specializes in breaking down complex crypto topics into clear, actionable insights for readers and traders alike.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.