XRP Ledger v3.2.0 Node Migration Triggers Pubkey Mismatch, Upgrade Rate Stalls At 30%

Kritika Mehta
Updated
Kritika boasts over 4 years of experience in the financial news sector. Currently working as a crypto journalist at Coingape, she has consistently shown a knack for blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. Kritika combines insightful analysis with a deep understanding of market trends. With a keen interest in technical analysis, she brings a nuanced perspective to her reporting, exploring the intersection of finance, technology, and emerging trends in the crypto space.
Read full bio
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
XRP Ledger v3.2.0 Node Migration Triggers Pubkey Mismatch, Upgrade Rate Stalls At 30%

Highlights

  • The XRP Ledger v3.2.0 upgrade has led to critical issues during node migration.
  • A node operator has reported issues of public key mismatch after migrating.
  • Meanwhile, the latest version's adoption has stalled with only 30% nodes updated.

The XRP Ledger (XRPL) v3.2.0 upgrade has again caused concerns among node operators, who highlighted a network defect. The scrutiny comes as node migration of validators resulted in discrepancy in public key information between the service log and node data.

XRP Ledger Migration Shows Critical Flaws

The above-mentioned issue was filed on GitHub under report #7581, “Service log file shows validator pubkey other than what is used.” The complaint states that the issue arose when they migrated an existing validator to an existing RPC node with XRP Ledger v3.2.0 in place.

After migration, the validator said, “the service log shows the correct new validator pubkey, however the actual server is running with the old pubkey stored in wallet.db.”

Moreover, the report explained that just adding an existing validator token to an active RPC node and restarting the server was enough to reproduce the behavior. Earlier, last week, other operators also flagged several bugs in the latest XRPL mainnet upgrade.

Under the expected outcome on XRP Ledger, the operator states that “both service logs and server_info should return the same validator pubkey.” The reported result, however, had the public key of the migrated validator token in the service log. Meanwhile, the older validator key stored locally remained in the server_info endpoint.

This flaw is affecting XRP Ledger version 3.2.0 for nodes running Ubuntu 22.04. As a temporary measure, the operator suggested that the logs should show the validator key, which is actually used by the server. On the other hand, the validator noted that the logs could present both the derived and active keys so as not to cause confusion during migrations.

XRPL v3.2.0 Adoption Remains Low

The report came out days after XRP Ledger v3.2.0 was launched which rebranded the key server software in the system from “rippled” to “xrpld” on June 15. In addition, it rolled out the fixCleanup3_2_0 amendment. It is now in the process of being voted on by the validators.

XRP Ledger
XRP Ledger version 3.2.0 witnesses low validator adoption. Source: XRPScan

However, the most recent release was not well adopted, according to code data. As of this writing, around 30% of the nodes are running v3.2.0, per XRPScan. In the meantime, 61% of node operators are still running v3.1.3.

Support for the fixCleanup3_2_0 amendment with 14.29% of validators has also been low so far despite support from Ripple. Now, the operators are expected to have completed the upgrades before the amendment is activated to avoid the amendment-blocked status.

Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more… to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

Newsletter
Your crypto brief.
Delivered every day.
  • Insights that move markets
  • 100,000 active subscribers
By signing-up you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
About Author
About Author
Kritika boasts over 4 years of experience in the financial news sector. Currently working as a crypto journalist at Coingape, she has consistently shown a knack for blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. Kritika combines insightful analysis with a deep understanding of market trends. With a keen interest in technical analysis, she brings a nuanced perspective to her reporting, exploring the intersection of finance, technology, and emerging trends in the crypto space.